QUOTE (mosebilt @ Sep 13 2008, 09:37 AM)


4 wheel a-arm,30" wheel travel all four corners,60 gallons of fuel (or just rear tank),sway bars front and rear,4 wheel cantilever shock set up (or conventional if wanted),S4D,CBM 402 stroker,37" tires,3000 lb. weight-these cars are basically "gen 2" of my existing MB2 or 4 cars- wheelbase is the same,chassis the same (2.5" taller mid rail),front suspension is the same,only these are rear a-arm. by using rear a-arm you get better handling characteristics,using body roll to keep the outside tire vertical in a turn=better cornering ability, where trailing arms every degree of body roll translates to camber change-either positive of negative,either way you are loosing tire contact surface with the ground. by running "inboard" cantilever shocks,the suspension parts can be made lighter,saving weight.
the rocker arms and shocks now are "sprung" weight-which is what you want.more sprung weight,plus less unsprung weight=more wheel control/better handling. also you can adjust the ride height of the car 4" without touching the coil overs-you use the link rod that goes from the lower a-arm to the rocker arm,kinda cool.these cars will be lighter than they look,so can go to the desert or dunes (with 60 gallons of fuel will be fun in Mexico!)

Mosebilt
sorry , but i have to disagree on that ;
a cantilever pushrod/idler/shock setup is actually
adding un-suspended mass. the pushrod and the idler arm mass moves
together with your suspension

a cantilever setup is very popular in high speed motorsport applications to remove the shock/coil out of the slipstream but i dont see the benefit in offroad unless you run a reduction ratio on the idler and use somewhat lighter, shorter stroke shocks ...but then you need stiffer (heavier ) springs to compensate for the reduction ratio of the idler .....
but hey...what do i know
looks great...very beefy