Yamiboy
Jan 14 2004, 09:35 PM
ok i usually run premium in my banshee with a 32:1 premix. never had a problem. i just bought my first 5 gals of race gas. i mixed the race and premium to a 50:50 ratio. 2.5gal race and 2.5 prem. my questions is what coctane is race gas.
i thought there were different octanes. i figured that the gas was 110 octane. well i was told it was 120 oct. so now im not sure. what is the most common octane in race gas? what other octanes are there for racing?
also if i run this 50:50 race:prem. mix is my bike in any danger of motor problems? i know high octane makes it run hotter but am i risking my motor?
for those who might know the gas station its the one in El Cajon across the street from AM/PM off mollison. so if any of you know what octane they run in that gas would help me out alot.
rich
RRon3
Jan 14 2004, 09:45 PM
I doubt it is 120 octane. Is it VP? VP red is 106 octane and C-12 is 108 octane.
Yamiboy
Jan 14 2004, 09:49 PM
see i dont know which one it is but i highly figured it was that high. cuz i know they all usually run around 107 to 111 octane. i figured 120 was way too high.
i pumped it from a gas station so i dont know what brand they have.
rich
DUNE
Jan 14 2004, 09:58 PM
I like running a 50/50 of C-12/108 to 91 pump.
Ck out
http://www.vpracingfuels.com They should have better info for you...
LateNate
Jan 14 2004, 11:21 PM
| QUOTE (Yamiboy @ Jan 14 2004, 09:35 PM) |
| I know high octane makes it run hotter but am i risking my motor? |
It’s the opposite, high octane makes it run cooler. If you run to high an octane on a 2-stroke that doesn’t need it you will foul the plug quicker and a lot of crap will build up inside the engine because it’s not burning completely. High octane fuel is designed to burn at a higher temperature to keep it from igniting prematurely in high compression engines. But if it doesn’t burn hot enough the oil in the fuel will not burn completely.
If you’re not getting premature detonation (knocking) with pump gas then higher octane is just a waste of money.
Screamin Ian
Jan 15 2004, 10:12 AM
ALOT of people dont know this, but higher octane means less horsepower, it does absolutely nothing to make your ride faster, it is strickly a burning issue, where and how it burns in the cylinder, burns cooler, more efficient and not as fast. I thought it was the other way around, until I did my homework.
Bronc-O-Boy11
Jan 15 2004, 12:48 PM
Great info....i didn't know that, Does anyone know of a web site where i could do some reading on this. In Canada it gets pretty cold up here and i plan on riding in the winter, ice racing. YFZ450 here says 91octane minimum....wonder if it would be better to run a lower octane in the winter??
ISBB
Jan 15 2004, 12:53 PM
Bronc-o-boy11 i have a wr426 almost the same motor... with 91 pump climbing some of the big hills out in glamis i was getting some knocking... so i switched to 50:50 91 and f&l sp1 wich is 111 took care of all the knocks and has a little better throttle response now...
BaNsHeE350
Jan 15 2004, 01:32 PM
you also have to remember that you are not running higher compression and wild cams....race gas is not needed. Adding race gas to a stock or fairly engine will do no good at all, just cost you alot more money
Rubs
Jan 15 2004, 01:59 PM
| QUOTE (Screamin Ian @ Jan 15 2004, 10:12 AM) |
| ALOT of people dont know this, but higher octane means less horsepower |
I disagree with you on this one. Look at any hp figures ran on a dyno with 91-92oct and then race fuel and you will see a couple hp difference. More octain means it takes more heat to combust, more octain will eliminates hp loss from pre detenation but you must have enough ignition to detenate some race gas like 116-118 or yes you will loose hp
Screamin Ian
Jan 15 2004, 02:06 PM
I see your point, with modified engines, ignition systems yes lower octane will lower your horsepower, but in general, most people think I have a stock ..... and if I put race gas in it, it will turn into a rocket, I will be cool then, wrong. that was the point I was trying to make. hope nobody took it the wrong way and they are all putting 87 in their supercharged, turbo, high compression nos having death buggies.
Rubs
Jan 15 2004, 02:55 PM
| QUOTE (Screamin Ian @ Jan 15 2004, 02:06 PM) |
| I see your point, with modified engines, ignition systems yes lower octane will lower your horsepower, but in general, most people think I have a stock ..... and if I put race gas in it, it will turn into a rocket, I will be cool then, wrong. that was the point I was trying to make. hope nobody took it the wrong way and they are all putting 87 in their supercharged, turbo, high compression nos having death buggies. |
You are correct with your statement on a stock bike it will not really give you a much faster bike but with current fuel the way it is yes even a stock bike will benifit power wise from race fuel but the big advantage is 50/50 91/race fuel will make a top end on 2 strokes last longer. I was looking for the link that gave dyno numbers on stock bikes with 91oct and race fuel but I havent found it yet.
ISBB
Jan 15 2004, 03:23 PM
| QUOTE (Rubths @ Jan 15 2004, 02:55 PM) |
| QUOTE (Screamin Ian @ Jan 15 2004, 02:06 PM) | | I see your point, with modified engines, ignition systems yes lower octane will lower your horsepower, but in general, most people think I have a stock ..... and if I put race gas in it, it will turn into a rocket, I will be cool then, wrong. that was the point I was trying to make. hope nobody took it the wrong way and they are all putting 87 in their supercharged, turbo, high compression nos having death buggies. |
You are correct with your statement on a stock bike it will not really give you a much faster bike but with current fuel the way it is yes even a stock bike will benifit power wise from race fuel but the big advantage is 50/50 91/race fuel will make a top end on 2 strokes last longer. I was looking for the link that gave dyno numbers on stock bikes with 91oct and race fuel but I havent found it yet.
|
Rubths has a point... but can im also going to chime in on the point that the gas will not make you go faster on a stock motor... YES you will notice a small diffrence mainly in your knocking if any going away and better throttle response... thats about the only bennifit... IF you have these issues... I did... so i bumped up the octane a little and cured those 2 problems... My bike does not go any faster than it did before the gas...
Rubs
Jan 15 2004, 04:03 PM
| QUOTE (ISBB @ Jan 15 2004, 03:23 PM) |
| QUOTE (Rubths @ Jan 15 2004, 02:55 PM) | | QUOTE (Screamin Ian @ Jan 15 2004, 02:06 PM) | | I see your point, with modified engines, ignition systems yes lower octane will lower your horsepower, but in general, most people think I have a stock ..... and if I put race gas in it, it will turn into a rocket, I will be cool then, wrong. that was the point I was trying to make. hope nobody took it the wrong way and they are all putting 87 in their supercharged, turbo, high compression nos having death buggies. |
You are correct with your statement on a stock bike it will not really give you a much faster bike but with current fuel the way it is yes even a stock bike will benifit power wise from race fuel but the big advantage is 50/50 91/race fuel will make a top end on 2 strokes last longer. I was looking for the link that gave dyno numbers on stock bikes with 91oct and race fuel but I havent found it yet.
|
Rubths has a point... but can im also going to chime in on the point that the gas will not make you go faster on a stock motor... YES you will notice a small diffrence mainly in your knocking if any going away and better throttle response... thats about the only bennifit... IF you have these issues... I did... so i bumped up the octane a little and cured those 2 problems... My bike does not go any faster than it did before the gas...
|
ISBB there will be a dyno in Glamis this weekend, heres the proposal. We will find a new bone stock banshee and I will provide the race fuel you will provide the 91oct and I will bet a drum of C12 that the race gas gets higher hp numbers.
It may not be much of a difference but my point is that it will give more hp and performance!
Are you up for it
BaNsHeE350
Jan 15 2004, 04:35 PM
it maybe make a little more power...cause it burns cooler...but it is hardly noticeable/worth the money if your engine does not require that high of an octane
Screamin Ian
Jan 15 2004, 04:59 PM
I really dont know where we are going with this, I think we all pretty much agree that unless your motor needs high octane gas, its not worth the money or time to get it, I will be the first to admit that I am not Joe Mechanic, and dont know a whole lot about motors, but I have owned several motors, which required high octane, both 2 and 4 stroke, jet skis, and VW, really high compression motors, when I put lower octane in them they ran like crap, so it does make a difference, but for the majority of people I have come across they are under the assumption of the higher the octane the higher the horsepower, and that is simply not true, I am sure we have all come across someone at some point who is putting "race gas" in their stock quad for the big weekend cuz they want to beat their friend up the hill. maybe in their minds it helps, but not in reality. Modified motors I 100% agree that it makes a difference, but for the average Joe, paying an extra $4 plus a gallon, not worth it.
Rubs
Jan 15 2004, 05:32 PM
| QUOTE (Screamin Ian @ Jan 15 2004, 10:12 AM) |
| ALOT of people dont know this, but higher octane means less horsepower |
I guess I was trying to set the record straight regarding this post you made. I would only find it true if lets say you are trying to burn 116 or higher octain in a stock motor that the ignition system cant handle. I once put 116 in my lawn mower becuase it was the only fuel I had at the time and the mower would not start becuase it could not light it off.
Your right in saying race gas would be a waste of money for a stock bike if you wanted it to perform like every other stock "like" bike but the fact is YOU WILL MAKE MORE HP WITH HIGHER OCTAIN! Anyone that wants to dispute this can put there money up against mine at the dyno
Im not a know it all regarding race gas and not trying to bash anyone here I just dont want anyone getting false information regarding something they are inquiring about
Rubberneck
Jan 15 2004, 05:55 PM
I put C-12 in my tacoma once when I had no other choice.

I also ran c-12 in my buggy but since I got rid of it I haven't tried any race gas in my bikes. I was tempted to use it on my kx500 but wasn't sure if it would make a difference. I'll just need about 10 gallons of it mixed 50/50 with 91. I'll have to try it next trip.

rubths, you soon to be country effer!

Trying to take advantage of a young ISBB with your proposal.
Rubs
Jan 15 2004, 06:13 PM
| QUOTE (Rubberneck @ Jan 15 2004, 05:55 PM) |
rubths, you soon to be country effer! Trying to take advantage of a young ISBB with your proposal. 
|
You to will soon be a little country effer but I will be there first

Whats wrong with a little wager
LateNate
Jan 16 2004, 08:39 PM
Octane requirements can be different between bikes and quads, and models. When my 400ex engine was stock it would run on 91 without knock no matter how hard I pushed it and might have even been designed to run on 87 (but I could be wrong). Now in my new ’03 cr250 manual it says to run 95 minimum and when I run straight 91 it will knock at high rpm under load. But it’s designed to be a closed track race bike where as banshees aren’t. All that being said I don’t know what Yamaha says to use in the Banshee. Anybody know?
LateNate
Jan 16 2004, 08:45 PM
| QUOTE (Rubths @ Jan 15 2004, 02:55 PM) |
| ...but the big advantage is 50/50 91/race fuel will make a top end on 2 strokes last longer. |
How?
Dman233
Jan 16 2004, 11:24 PM
Let's throw Ult. 4 and 2 into the mix. They are slightly higher in octane but significantly higher in Oxygen content. They make 6% more hp than pump gas on a stock motor. The ult. 4 is 92.2 oct. and ult 2 is 100.9 oct. Here's some gas that'll give you that slight edge on a stock machine. The price is super steep for this stuff.
BaNsHeE350
Jan 17 2004, 08:17 AM
you ever see how much Ultimate 4 costs? It is ridiculous. My buddy runs that in his Laegers CRF quad....I don't know how he affords it
Yamiboy
Jan 19 2004, 07:49 AM
well i just got back last night and it didnt make any real difference on power. well i didnt feel any difference. the bike seemed to run alittle hotter than normal but it wasnt a dangerous level of warm. and this was at a 50:50 mix race to premium.
i dont plan to run it all the time i just wanted to try it for this weekend to see how it does. if it was gonna be a huge difference then i would have planned to run it all the time but since it wasnt a noticable difference beside in my pocket book then ill stick with pure premium.
rich
tron
Jan 19 2004, 10:17 PM
On 4 strokes, if ya ping, use it, if not, don't.
my opinion only.
fyi I run 91 pump in my 440exs, and 50/50 91 pump and VP110 in my Yamaha 450s (which is the same mix I use in my turbo charged rail)
tomfish1
Jan 20 2004, 12:43 PM
CRF 450 (stock or not) + Ultimate IV =
will give you as much oomph on a stock bike as bolting on a pipe.
It is worth the $9 per gallon on dune weekends.
Try it and see for yourself.
Rubs
Jan 20 2004, 01:13 PM
| QUOTE (tomfish1 @ Jan 20 2004, 12:43 PM) |
CRF 450 (stock or not) + Ultimate IV = will give you as much oomph on a stock bike as bolting on a pipe. It is worth the $9 per gallon on dune weekends. Try it and see for yourself. |
I tried ultimate 4 this last weekend and could not believe what it did for my DS650. I didnt really feel much difference on the bottom end but I got much better midrange power and the bike pulled even harder on the top end.
Mr.DUNE
Jul 7 2008, 03:52 PM
Race gas can anyone afford it now..
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.