Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Closed Dune Area!
GlamisDunes.com > Sand Community Issues > Glamis Issues
Pages: 1, 2
DS650-FOX
This past week @ ogibly we went riding. I have never been to ogibly b4. there was a section of the red closed markers that was not marked... 2 hours later we found ourselves returning from an awesome virgin sand ride. There was a few tracks, so we thought nothing of being in there... O well. It was fun while it lasted:)
SailAway
Unfortunately, the improper marking of these closed areas is causing trouble for us duners.

Those areas are still closed and they are still off limits and the incursions are being documented by the anti-access bad guys, and they are using that to their advantage.

We can, of course, hope that the judge can see the closures are merely tools at this point but that's hoping for an awfully lot and the stakes are awfully high.

Vicki
The Pastor
Just a note:
It is my opinion that the longer this stuff gets drug out, the more "incursions" that will happen. You see, I feel that in general, the duning public saw the closures and said... "Ok, now lets get them removed. If staying out of there for a while will help then fine." But as time goes by the opinion is changing to: "Damn, when is this gonna end... ahhh screw 'em. I'm sick of all this bullcrap!"

The increase of incursions will be in direct proportion to the amount of time gone by. There is no way that the closures will ever be accepted like those north of 78.

The BLM should realize that there are a significant number of duners who will simply ignore this bullcrap closure and they had better do something....LIKE GET THEM OPEN!!!

BTW: I'm no lawyer but I've looked the law up and it definantly leaves a loophole. If you don't see a closure sign then you've not broken the law.

The Pastor
tron
QUOTE (The Pastor @ Jan 15 2004, 11:17 AM)
BTW: I'm no lawyer but I've looked the law up and it definantly leaves a loophole. If you don't see a closure sign then you've not broken the law.

Well, from my experiance they will still write you for it. I was duning with my "China Wall" lady friend and we blasted into the closed area without realizing it, once the dunes didn't look familiar I knew I was where I shouldn't be. We headed straight out and two LEOs were waiting for us. I told them I'd pay them $100 each if they re-traced my tracks and found a sign anywhere near where I entered. They didn't do that, but only gave me one ticket, they were nice about it, but they still wrote me up. It certainly wasn't worth it for me to fight it, even if I won it would cost me more than $100 of my time - and I usualy fight such things.

I have a question for SailAway though, I keep hearing rumors that you can pay a fee to access the closed areas - is that true or just a rumor?
The Pastor
What was the fine? $100?
It's my understanding that the fine can be quite high and could even include jail time.

I understand that they will still write you up... but all it would take in court is some pictures of all of the fallen signs to convince a judge.

The Pastor
SailAway
QUOTE (tron @ Jan 15 2004, 05:01 PM)
I have a question for SailAway though, I keep hearing rumors that you can pay a fee to access the closed areas - is that true or just a rumor?

That's just a rumor, but it probably stems from a system that will be developed once (if) the Recreation Area Management Plan is finally adopted and put into play.

That system is a "permit" system for accessing what will be called the "Adaptive Management Area," which (with some tweeking of boundaries) is the large north dunes closure now.

Although nobody seems to know exactly what will be the final procedure, the tentative plan is to have duners apply for a permit to access that area. They will also have to take a "conservation awareness" test.

There was talk for a while about charging for those permits but I do believe that was booed down long ago.

That's the long answer.

The short answer is there is no legal way to ride in those areas until the court order is rescinded.

Vicki
tron
QUOTE (The Pastor @ Jan 15 2004, 05:05 PM)
What was the fine? $100?
It's my understanding that the fine can be quite high and could even include jail time.

I understand that they will still write you up... but all it would take in court is some pictures of all of the fallen signs to convince a judge.

The Pastor

Yes, the fine was $100, nothing goes on your record, DMV or otherwise.

I understand about court, but it would take me 3 hours just to drive to Imperial County, let alone the time for prep and appearance, and another 3 hours back, that is what I meant when I said it wasn't worth it to fight it.

-tron
Thelast929
Other than accidental incursions, I don't think it's a good idea to intentionally enter the closed areas. It makes us all look bad. Except for some of the areas along the south of the closures, there may be expanses of sand that have no marking but there is usually a visible buggy trail with tracks on one side and virgin sand on the other. In the beginning we saw a lot of slalom tracks at the markers as a form of F-U. I've not seen much of this recently.
On a separate but similar issue, the rules and enforcement of these rules have increased due to people's lack of respect for those around them. The free-for-all needs to stop. We are starting to see Comp conditions arise at Olds already. I've seen duners already help put a stop to some of the activities like trench digging. We need to police ourselves and even tone down some of the exciting/crazy things we've done in the past in order to ease the pressure of the LEO's.
Just my $0.02
The Pastor
The LEO pressure will never be eased...
They are here to stay, as long as they are collecting their own money... count on it.

I gotta say, though, that a potential $100 fine is not much of a deterrant!

The Pastor smokin.gif
CHEFF
I've seen numerous temporary closure stakes laying flat on the ground. Earlier in the campaign, I used to pick them up to help in the situation. Now, Eff them. But I still don't go in the closed area. And every time I ride by them, there's no doubt i'm looking over at the virgin sand just wanting to mark my territory. Peace
Slappy
They shoulda been down a long long time ago...This is one thing that Slap gets all mcflustered about...Milkvetch fine, closures still up...However, SailAway has told Slap that them enviro's (said with affection, cuz Slap is one) have a long list of plants and animals that they will sue over, and that just makes Slap wanna barf...
user posted image
swark
QUOTE (Slappy @ Jan 19 2004, 08:47 PM)
They shoulda been down a long long time ago...This is one thing that Slap gets all mcflustered about...Milkvetch fine, closures still up...However, SailAway has told Slap that them enviro's (said with affection, cuz Slap is one) have a long list of plants and animals that they will sue over, and that just makes Slap wanna barf...
user posted image

Well let's hope that in our busy duning time that we dont lose focus on the evil onlookers that want to close down the sport that so many of us love !!.
LoBuck
QUOTE (The Pastor @ Jan 16 2004, 06:06 PM)
The LEO pressure will never be eased...
They are here to stay, as long as they are collecting their own money... count on it.

I gotta say, though, that a potential $100 fine is not much of a deterrant!

The Pastor smokin.gif

$100 is not much of a deterant. But the chances of futher closures and more lawsuits against the BLM should be. None of us want that.
stonehenge
I can't even ride by the closures anymore, make me to sad! icon_cry.gif Besides all the virgin sand on the other side and the chop on my side, can't handle it, might go postal at a enviro-nazi-terrorist club meeting. angryfire.gif
SailAway
QUOTE (stonehenge @ Jan 20 2004, 07:47 AM)
I can't even ride by the closures anymore, make me to sad! icon_cry.gif

I believe that we should all be riding by the closures often. We need the reminders of what has happened.

Too often we become complacent, accepting, even after being so angry and righteous.

This is precisely what the anti-access groups want to have happen.

We cannot allow ourselves to be complacent, or accepting. We cannot stay quiet when the new-to-Glamis rider says "I think there's still plenty of room to ride" (I've heard it myself). That new-to-Glamis person needs to be educated on what Glamis was, and what it can be again if we don't back down. And they need to be told how we got there and who's to blame. Talk to them about the anti-access fools who put those markers in our sand.

The longer those closures are in place, the less people will remember how they got there.

We must not let that happen.

Visit the closures. Look at the wasted sand. Witness for yourselves the ugly scar left by the new sand highway that they have forced us to live with.

And remind yourselves that we did not ask for this and will not tolerate it.

Get mad. Get sad. And then do something about it.

Vicki
Chummin
EFFIN middle closure ruins my line at least once a day.. EFFIN POS stupid freggin maggots.. They put that Shiat right in the middle of the best line going from China Wall to the back side of Olds.. Just hate it.. AND I always see people wadded up on those drop offs along the side..

CLOSURES.. Remember when Comp was to be "Closed on MAJOR HOLIDAY WEEKENDS"??? NOW look at the same sign.. "Major holiday" is no longer on the sigh. ALL WEEKENDS is what it says now.. Im about 100% positive that when it was originally closed it was to be closed on the 6 holiday weekends only..
WHEN did this change take place?

Has ANYTHING been opened at all to date in history?
SailAway
QUOTE (Chummin @ Jan 20 2004, 12:46 PM)
ALL WEEKENDS is what it says now.. Im about 100% positive that when it was originally closed it was to be closed on the 6 holiday weekends only..
WHEN did this change take place?

You're right, it is supposed to be major holidays ONLY.

They tried to pull this once or twice last season also. I wasn't aware they were doing it again.

I'll start making calls.

Vicki
jhitesma
I haven't seen comp closed even on semi-large weekends. We were up there the weekend after Christmass (which I expected the BLM to consider a "large weekend") and comp was open. No barriers, no lights, no LEO's.

I don't remember the signs ever specifying what weekend...which led to a lot of confusion and rumors.

BTW - remember the comp closure is not a BLM action (though they did little to fight it) but is courtsey of the Imperial Valley Board of Supervisers. It was an IV resolution that specifies when and why comp will be closed not anything from the BLM.

SailAway
QUOTE (jhitesma @ Jan 20 2004, 01:39 PM)
BTW - remember the comp closure is not a BLM action (though they did little to fight it) but is courtsey of the Imperial Valley Board of Supervisers.  It was an IV resolution that specifies when and why comp will be closed not anything from the BLM.

Only because the BLM did not have the power to enact such a "curfew" with such speed. It was done at the request of the BLM, without public input or knowledge.

The meeting took place between BLM Law Enforcement and the Imperial County Board of Supervisors (and Imperial County Sheriff?) and the IVBOS drafted a resolution to give the authority to place a curfew in the dunes.

No, it is not a Bureau of Land Management resolution but it was most definitely brought about by the Bureau of Land Management directly.

And the signs are supposed to specify which weekends, or they are to be removed. That's the fight we had last year and apparently that's the fight we have this year.

Vicki
The Pastor
The sign has GOT to change. It's said "Closed from dusk to dawn" for far too long. It is quite clear that the BLM want people to think it's closed even when it's not.

And, as for it being an IVBOS thing, that is true... but the alligations were that the BLM actually encouraged this action, maybe even gave them the idea, since the BOS could make the change with the sweep of a pen but the BLM would have to actually follow some guidelines... like listen to the people first!

The closure: The reality is that the longer the closure is up the more people are going to say "eff it... I'm duning"... You can argue whether this is bad or good for the "cause" all day long but that is not going to change.

The signs are not visible in far too many places. A citation would NEVER hold up in court and any negative argument used by anyone stating that there are frequent incursions is easily negated and placed on the BLM's head with a simple video of all the fallen stakes.

Bottom line... recomend that people don't go in to the closure... but I will NEVER beat someone up over it if they decide to or accidently drive in the closure!!!

The Pastor
SailAway
I've said since the "curfew" was enacted that I disagreed less with what was done than how it was done.

The ICBOS did not come up with this idea and then approach the BLM with it.

A Freedom of Information Act request would prove who asked for it, and so would a copy of the transcript from those long ago ICBOS meetings.

It's a moot point as far as the curfews now, but it is a valid concern when we consider the history and how aware we must all be.

Give me back my rose-colored glasses. icon_wink.gif

Vicki
The Pastor
Vicki, your's and my last two posts came in at the same time. (I had not read what you posted when I posted my last post)

I was fairly certain that what you said was true, that the BLM told the ICBOS to put up a cerfew. I was just more unsure then you are on that fact.

icon_biggrin.gif

The Pastor smokin.gif
SailAway
I spoke to Neil Hamada about the signs and he's checking and will get back to me. He confirmed that there should be ZERO signs up right now and when they are up, they are supposed to specify which weekends the curfew is in effect.

I'll update when I get one.

Does anyone have the opportunity to get a picture of the sign?

Vicki
socaldmax
I remember something like 8 or 9 months ago, there was a great deal of talk about a stake pulling party.

What ever happened to this? There are a few things rattling around in my head.


1. Stake pulling party.

2. Boycott the Glamis Beach store.

3. Duners need to take ownership of the dunes. No trench diggers, no punks, NO TRASH!

4. I'd like to see a daily satellite photo of the closed areas (especially North of 78) for the last yr. I'll bet dollars to donuts there isn't a single hiker to be seen anywhere in the dunes, ever.

I think it's time we quit taking a defensive stance and go on the offensive.

1. Initiate investigations into impropriety, malfeasance, etc against ALL organizations that oppose us.
2. Discredit ALL of their "science".
3. Get strong public sentiment thru positive articles about motorsports in the dunes on as many media outlets as possible, emphasize the family angle.
4. Enlist the motorcycle/motorsports industry to bankroll an ad campaign to raise public awareness about the millions of dollars of taxpayers' money wasted by these enviro whackjobs and all of the acres of PUBLIC LAND that they have closed off to the public. angryfire.gif angryfire.gif

There are some persuasive, persistent people involved in our cause. I'd like to see them turn their attention to fighting this like a war. Get bigger, stronger allies than your opponent, then crush them with no mercy. Get industry support - big money, strong allies, politicians who want to or will be forced to vote the way we want.

Of course a few yrs ago, my answer would have been to kill them all, so I AM making significant progress... laughing.gif
Chummin
QUOTE (SailAway @ Jan 20 2004, 06:01 PM)
I spoke to Neil Hamada about the signs and he's checking and will get back to me. He confirmed that there should be ZERO signs up right now and when they are up, they are supposed to specify which weekends the curfew is in effect.

I'll update when I get one.

Does anyone have the opportunity to get a picture of the sign?

Vicki

The sign is the one when heading East on the 78 just after you make the left turn in front of the mad-cow farm.
SailAway
QUOTE (socaldmax @ Jan 20 2004, 06:26 PM)
1. Stake pulling party.

2. Boycott the Glamis Beach store.

3. Duners need to take ownership of the dunes. No trench diggers, no punks, NO TRASH!

4. I'd like to see a daily satellite photo of the closed areas (especially North of 78) for the last yr. I'll bet dollars to donuts there isn't a single hiker to be seen anywhere in the dunes, ever.

Progress is good icon_biggrin.gif

A few points...

1. The stake pulling party cannot happen until the biological opinion swims back out of court.

2. I know a lot of people who are still up for this... it was talked about again over the weekend. Just takes someone to organize it.

3. Couldn't agree more, we need to take ownership. Education is a key to a lot of the problems. DUNERS is back on track with the Junior Duners programs (starting up again in February) and we've discussed having Glamis dune meetings too... like fireside chats but without the fire :-)

4. I absolutely agree. The only "hikers" we see in the dunes are the ones moving away from a limping ride.

Couldn't agree more on needing a more agressive stance.

With the cleanup behind us, we have until summer to get back to work on some important issues.

Where should we begin?

Vicki
Chummin
I have pics of many hikers in the dunes.. Its called the annual golf tourney!!!!!
jhitesma
QUOTE (SailAway @ Jan 20 2004, 02:51 PM)
QUOTE (jhitesma @ Jan 20 2004, 01:39 PM)
BTW - remember the comp closure is not a BLM action (though they did little to fight it) but is courtsey of the Imperial Valley Board of Supervisers.  It was an IV resolution that specifies when and why comp will be closed not anything from the BLM.

Only because the BLM did not have the power to enact such a "curfew" with such speed. It was done at the request of the BLM, without public input or knowledge.

The meeting took place between BLM Law Enforcement and the Imperial County Board of Supervisors (and Imperial County Sheriff?) and the IVBOS drafted a resolution to give the authority to place a curfew in the dunes.

No, it is not a Bureau of Land Management resolution but it was most definitely brought about by the Bureau of Land Management directly.

And the signs are supposed to specify which weekends, or they are to be removed. That's the fight we had last year and apparently that's the fight we have this year.

Vicki

Funny how a year and a half can change someones opinions....but facts still stay the same.

Vicki it was you who scolded me for blaming the BLM when this happened:

QUOTE

What's really troubling is how quickly everyone turns on the BLM. Every time I hear someone blame the BLM for this kind of move I realize once again that more people must be reached. Something that may not be obvious is it's exactly that kind of statement that caused this move. It was not enacted just out of a need to curb the arrests and/or citations but also to curb the growing (and misplaced and dangerous) resentment. Even the poor fee attendants are starting to get more and more ugly remarks and that little chore is run by a privately owned company. Such a misdirection of blame only increases tension and can't possibly do anything but make the situation worse.

How can we make people see that the BLM, in many cases and in particular this case, is NOT the enemy???


(emphasis added by me - original post Here)

In fact you even confirmed Thomas' report from the meeting that at the start of the meeting Greg from the BLM announced that there would be no curfew/closure and was caught off guard when the BLM did enact a curfew mainly due to the prodding of the IC Sheriff who was adamant that it was completely necessary and the only way to get a handle on the dunes.

From Thomas:
QUOTE

Jason,

you are kicking the wrong butt

Today at the meeting Greg first made it clear BLM has no plans for this closures ... then he called later in with the news ... again it is a county ordinance and tomorrow you can read it most likely in the LA Times.

BTW. BLM is not happy with this ordinance, not the El Centro field office and also not the Barstow office. You can be sure we up at Dumont will feel this closure ....


To which Vicki replied (In the same message I partially quoted above):

QUOTE

It seems the announcement came as a surprise to many, but the thought behind it has been around for a long time. Thomas is right, I was at the same meeting and the announcement came as a surprise to many there, especially after Greg's announcement that it was not going forward.


At least VOR is consistent icon_biggrin.gif :

QUOTE

**** right the BLM gets the blame. They are the ones who supposedly manage this area. The public, including me, is getting sick and tired of seeing restriction after restriction placed upon us, including the *** **** DEMO FEE! SCREW THOSE PARKING ATTENDANTS WHO ARE COMMITING A CRIME WHEN THEY DETAIN ME ON A PUBLIC ROAD TO CHARGE ME FOR ACCESSING PUBLIC LAND!

**** right we're mad. It's not just the BLM... it's the authority in general! They've used and abused us and our little piece of heaven. They found out that a huge number of people were having an imense amount of fun WITHOUT THEM!!!

SailAway
Yep, that sure is inconsistent.

Gee, I wonder what new information was learned that may have helped me change my stance? Thomas, maybe you can help me figure out this puzzle.

Let's see... there was this meeting that had Greg Thomsen in it, and us, and we were told one thing and we formed an opinion based on what we were told.

And then gosh, maybe we learned other information later on.

We've learned a lot since then. Heck, we've learned a lot since this fight began.

Oh my goodness. Yep, you sure got me there. Guess I changed my tune.

Give my mom a call... I think she may resent me for the time when I was six and said I was going to be a doctor when I grew up. You guys can commiserate.

Vicki
SailAway
Sorry about the sarcasm but geez Louise, the time and energy that has been expended just to prove that I formed an opinion, voiced it, acted on it, then learned from it and changed direction just boggles my mind.

I believe even the consistent VOR has done that same thing... he's certainly entitled to. Actually, I kinda hope we all could do that more often instead of just sticking our fingers in our ears and humming loudly when we don't want to hear something that doesn't jive with what we "know."

Consistency is important.

Learning from each other and our mistakes is also important.

Learning to stop fighting each other and turn the heat on the ones who caused the closures would be really dandy.

Vicki
Shovel Boy
nooO!
Sandwizard
Was in G this Weekend, icon_biggrin.gif and at Vicky’s post/suggestion above we drove by the closures, in fact we drove around the whole center closer and the north side of big closure. icon_bigcry.gif and your right, many of the markers are missing! Although the north boundary was well followed, the center one was easily lost, and incursion into the closer was inevitable. blink.gif

25soapbox.gif

So I usually buy the ASA rhetoric, donate money, been to all the clean ups, (except for the last one, sorry wont let it happen again) and had faith that the closures would be down by now? angryfire.gif I always thought Vor/ Pastor views were a little on the militant side, and a simi angry vent. (Sorry Vor, only going by what I've read over the last few years) But I'm starting to think he may have some valid points, especially on making a stand shock.gif


So let have a protest icon_hot.gif how about 1000, or more peeps holding out in the center closure, with media coverage! I'll go & pay my fine, hell take me, my wife and child to jail! Now wouldn’t that be a Kodak moment shock.gif

Of course for this to work it would have to be massive, putting a face of peaceful families, protesting a broken system that’s eroding family value's, and not reckless, and violent peeps.
jhitesma
Staying out of the closures isn't about fines and breaking the law.

It's about a little clause in the CBD lawsuit that says as long as the closures are not ignored they'll hold off on any more lawsuits.

Hell, we already know they're going to sue as soon as the closures eventually are removed (though anyone who thought they'd be down by now is WAY too optimistic - this is the federal government we're dealing with things take a LONG time to get done when they're easy and this one isn't easy!) and people are already preparing for that.

We don't need to make the fight any harder by giving them cause to sue again before the current closures are down. That just plays into their "take half then take half again and repeat" game plan.

Right now they can't sue for more closures without breaking their side of the settlement agreement - unless people start riding in there. It's one of the few "wins" for our side in the settlement.







Sanduners
Mark this date down... May 31st. The day USFWS has to decide if the Peirson's Milk Vetch gets de-listed. Within a week it should be in the Fed. Register for the world to see that "real" science wins again. icon_cool.gif


You do have a calendar right??? If not get one here from one of the organizations that is making this happen. This can only happen if funds are raised to have great lawyers and representation where it matters. icon_smile.gif

http://www.americansandassociation.org/store/
Robbie
keepin my fingers crossed
Chummin
Still EFFIN closed in my book.. Hope for the effin best but they just keep closing more and more and more..
The Pastor
Believe me, I've considered a "protest" of this type...
But, I believe that there is the possibility of very large fines and even jail time. I'm certain that if anything was done like this then the maximum would be levied... It wouldn't be a matter of paying a simple $100 fine.

QUOTE
Mark this date down... May 31st. The day USFWS has to decide if the Peirson's Milk Vetch gets de-listed. Within a week it should be in the Fed. Register for the world to see that "real" science wins again.


My calender is full of "marks" that have come and gone...
Why would this be any different?

Finally, while it is certainly true that the ASA has done a lot in getting the closures open I have found that some of their "other" opinions just rub me wrong... mainly, their support of Demo Fees.

The Demo Fee program (and whatever comes in to replace it next year) WILL be the death of Glamis... not just closures but total destruction.
The mainstream off-road orginizations seem to have bought into the BLM's story that without Demo Fee Glamis would be closed... Basicly a veiled threat by the BLM. I do not believe this, and I don't take kindly to threats.

The Pastor
Washroad
QUOTE
My calender is full of "marks" that have come and gone...
Why would this be any different?


Bryan,
According to Mark Harms (chair of ASA legal team) at the ASA BOD meeting last weekend, the FWS is mandated to give a response by that time. Legally, they must respond.
The Pastor
Ok, So the FWS decides to delist the PMV... What makes you think this will cause the closures to be lifted?

Bottom line, the dunes are closed...
I'll believe they are open when I can dune there.

The Pastor
SailAway
QUOTE (The Pastor @ Jan 28 2004, 11:37 AM)
Ok, So the FWS decides to delist the PMV... What makes you think this will cause the closures to be lifted?

Bottom line, the dunes are closed...
I'll believe they are open when I can dune there.

The Pastor

The Pastor brings up an excellent point.

The lawsuit that put those closures in place is not about the condition of the PMV.

The lawsuit is about the Bureau of Land Management's monitoring practices.

If and when the PMV is delisted, there will be no automatic lifting of the closures. The closures are in the court system right now and procedures will have to be followed. The RAMP is the key at this point, along with the biological opinion on the RAMP.

Vicki
The Pastor
In otherwords, ... Work with the system so it can delay it for as long as possible and hopefully duners will forget about the closure...

I don't know about the rest of you but I'm pretty sick and tired of hearing... "procedures will have to be followed"

Procedures are not getting our dunes open.

If we have to follow procedures then so do they... The law states that if there is no sign then there is no closure. If the BLM want to keep people out of there then they had better get their ass in gear and get the signs put back up... (and don't even think of asking me to help!)

The Pastor
SailAway
QUOTE (The Pastor @ Jan 28 2004, 12:07 PM)
If the BLM want to keep people out of there then they had better get their ass in gear and get the signs put back up... (and don't even think of asking me to help!)

Ditto.
SailAway
QUOTE (Sandwizard @ Jan 27 2004, 11:14 PM)
Was in G this Weekend, icon_biggrin.gif and at Vicky’s post/suggestion above we drove by the closures, in fact we drove around the whole center closer and the north side of big closure. icon_bigcry.gif

Ouch, that must have been painful. But I'm glad you did it icon_cool.gif

A "protest" doesn't have to include breaking any laws. There is no reason we can't enter the temporarily closed areas... we just have to do it on foot.

Imagine the "small" central closure filled with people and ringed with sand toys.

With enough media priming it could be a very effective event.

But only if we could get enough of a show of force to really make an impressive sight.

Sure is something to think about.

Vicki
Sandwizard
So you think that if 1000 peeps are having a non violent sit in protest, The BLM, National Guard, LE will cart off all toughs folks with max fines and jail terms?

I don't think so, or Green peace wouldn’t have boats in the harbors all the time!

A Non Violent group of family protesting blatant ESA abuse would bring more publicity to this subject, we could get some pretty good media coverage!

The center closer was insisted on just to piss us off, burns my a$$

Make this an election issue,

ASA don't hire more lawyers, hire a publicists!

The Pastor
Now you're giving me an idea... I can see it forming...

Hmmm... A party in the closure... lots of wine - women - and song!!! BLM (and everyone else) leave the vehicles at the gate!

Hafta get some security... would suck to get some buggies stolen...

Will have to give this some thought!

The Pastor
SailAway
QUOTE (The Pastor @ Jan 28 2004, 06:21 PM)
Hafta get some security... would suck to get some buggies stolen...

Will have to give this some thought!

The Pastor

Actually I was thinking along the lines of having them chained/cabled/locked together... for safety and security reasons of course.

Vicki
Washroad
QUOTE
Procedures are not getting our dunes open.



What will?

While a sit-in-style protest might get some media attention, it really won't do a thing to open the dunes. Might get a few of the protesters pics on the news/in the newspapers, but it'll just be a 2 minute blip on the 5'o'clock news and be forgotten. The FWS and the BLM et.al. aren't impressed by public opinion.

But hey, you can have a fine party to talk about.

Sanduners
QUOTE (SailAway @ Jan 28 2004, 12:02 PM)
The lawsuit that put those closures in place is not about the condition of the PMV.

The lawsuit is about the Bureau of Land Management's monitoring practices.

If and when the PMV is delisted, there will be no automatic lifting of the closures.  The closures are in the court system right now and procedures will have to be followed.  The RAMP is the key at this point, along with the biological opinion on the RAMP.

Vicki


QUOTE
The interim closure is designed to protect essential habitat of the Peirson's milk-vetch (a Federally listed plant species) while allowing off-highway vehicle recreation to continue in the heavily used areas of the dunes. The Peirson's milk-vetch was listed as a threatened species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1998. The continued survival of this plant relies on the protection of its dune habitat.

This is from the BLM
http://www.ca.blm.gov/news/2000/11/nr/dune...clos_11-00.html

My understanding is if they de-list the plant there is no need for the closures. There is NOTHING else within those stakes regarding the Endangered Species Act that needs protection. Unless they get the Beetle listed before our date. angryfire.gif

The past 3 years of studies on the Pierson’s Milkvetch have shown that it is thriving and is not adversely affected by off-road vehicle activity. icon_cool.gif

Were still under the old 1987 RAMP where there is NO closed areas or no AMA (other than the North of Hwy 78). There may not be any automatic lifting of the closures but why would they be needed???

SailAway
QUOTE (Washroad @ Jan 29 2004, 03:50 AM)
QUOTE
Procedures are not getting our dunes open.



What will?

While a sit-in-style protest might get some media attention, it really won't do a thing to open the dunes. Might get a few of the protesters pics on the news/in the newspapers, but it'll just be a 2 minute blip on the 5'o'clock news and be forgotten. The FWS and the BLM et.al. aren't impressed by public opinion.

But hey, you can have a fine party to talk about.

Interesting.

And a media event in the dunes does what?

Please don't misunderstand me. I am a firm believer in how positive press can and does effect our fight and the ASA's media day event that Grant mentioned was a good thing. I think we need more media events aimed at the good aspects of our sport.

And I don't mean to be picking on you... I just wondered if you realized that some of those things you are sneering at are touted by all groups, including the one you so gallantly support.

If a sit-in is done properly and with enough support, it could have far-reaching effects.

If not, at least it will remind all those in attendance just what we're fighting for.

Either way, Glamis wins.

Vicki
SailAway
QUOTE (Sanduners @ Jan 29 2004, 04:05 AM)
There may not be any automatic lifting of the closures but why would they be needed???

They wouldn't be. But de-listing the PMV doesn't fulfill the court order.

Completing the RAMP does.

The closures are not in place due to logic... they are in place due to a judge's signature.

Vicki
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.