Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Workers Prepare To Monitor Desert
GlamisDunes.com > Sand Community Issues > Glamis Issues
Crowdog
Workers prepare to monitor desert

By MARC SCHANZ, Staff Writer

Saturday, February 28, 2004 10:22 PM PST

A group of environmental workers and government biologists will be criss-crossing the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area in the largest federal monitoring program of plant life and wildlife ever attempted in the sprawling dune ecosystem, U.S. Bureau of Land Management officials confirmed Friday.

More than 30 workers with the Environmental Careers Organization have been brought to the Valley by the bureau and are in the midst of training for the survey, which is scheduled to last through June 5, according to BLM spokesman Stephen Razo.

"(This program) encompasses a wide variety of monitoring that contributes to a level of ecosystem understanding," said Chris Knauf, a program coordinator with the BLM El Centro field office.

Attempting to canvass a multitude of plant and animal species — including the federally protected Peirson's milk-vetch — this survey is part of putting the wax on the recently aired dunes recreation area management plan proposed in 2003 by the BLM.

"A key part of this (survey) is establishing a baseline population count to monitor," El Centro branch Field Manager Greg Thomsen said.

One of the key provisions attached to the plan is the need for long-term and in-depth species monitoring.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service signed a "no jeopardy" biological opinion in April 2003 that gave BLM the go ahead for the plan as long as the BLM adheres to monitoring requirements.

A court challenge to that opinion sent it back to Fish and Wildlife for further study and the results are being awaited by the BLM, environmentalists and the off-highway vehicle lobby.

The way the BLM has counted plants in the dunes has been a contentious topic for many years.

The BLM has thrown out field studies from 1990 determined to be biased and scientifically unsound. A new monitoring program was started in 1998, where biologists walk transects, or predetermined sampling areas in the dunes.

The American Sand Association paid for its own study of the milk-vetch in 2001 and found more than 71,000 plants in the dunes.

"There were aspects of that survey that were not completely scientific," said Terry Weiner, a conservation coordinator with the Desert Protective Council. "All they did was count plants."

During the four-month BLM survey, crews will be surveying for milk-vetch, the Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard, concentrations of microphyll woodland and songbirds, according to Thomsen.

Nearly 150 separate milk-vetch transects are planned, according to Knauf, as well as 70 transects for microphyll woodland and 67 for the fringe-toed lizard.

The milk-vetch, the only plant under Endangered Species Act protection being surveyed, is what's behind this, some say.

"It's definitely a good thing that they are doing more monitoring out there. We support that," said Daniel Patterson, a desert ecologist with the Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity, one of the groups that has led the charge against the U.S. Department of the Interior and BLM to close off portions of the dunes to off-highway vehicle traffic.

"What's really behind this, we fear, is the political management of (BLM) attempting to use this monitoring as an all clear to open up the closed areas," Patterson added. "We can't support that." rolleyes.gif

"I think the field level staff (at BLM in El Centro) want to learn more about the populations out there," Patterson said. "The higher-ups want to hold this up to justify sacrificing habitat."

http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2004...news/news05.txt
D-n-Tyke
Where is the dunning community’s representation??? The eco's have theirs, and you know they will be fair in all their counts and reports. rolleyes.gif
PimpShackDave
They give a blurb on our study, then give 2-3 quotes to the eco-nazis ripping our survey and any other one that doesn't go their way. Scary...
The Pastor
QUOTE
"There were aspects of that survey that were not completely scientific," said Terry Weiner, a conservation coordinator with the Desert Protective Council. "All they did was count plants."

Counting is not scientific? What? Were they supposed to use some "New Science" method? You know, the kind where the numbers are pulled out of your arse???

Terry Weiner ... Blah Blah Blah...

The Pastor smokin.gif
PimpShackDave
From the VERY little I know about the ASA and their goings-on, it certainly seems that their survey is a little more scientific than 'counting plants.' I think they've also been identifying seedbanks and studying how the plants spread. As mentioned though, I don't really know it all myself. Anyone want to chime in or post up an informative link?

DAVe smokin.gif
jhitesma
Here's the thread on the ASA board where Dr. Phillips and the ASA both reply to the reporter who wrote this article:

http://www.americansandassociation.org/php...pic.php?t=14526

JET
I remember when the original BOD of the ASA was considering funding this study. Their biggest concern was integrity of the study and it was decided to go ahead and fund it regardless of the results. The only involvement that I have ever been aware of is/was to provide the funds and get volunteers to give rides and work under the direction of Dr. Phillips.
SailAway
Quite right. And as for the biological firm that has been doing these studies and Art Philips in particular, they are usually found on the "other side of the fence" and were fully prepared (if not expecting) to have to deliver bad news to the duning community.

It was a great and pleasant turn when the count came in to discover the PMV was thriving. Then the additional studies proved it wasn't a fluke.

Now we hope the Fish & Wildlife Service agrees. We'll know in May.

Oh my, wouldn't that go a long way to discredit the CBD and their motives!

Vicki
Washroad
QUOTE
"There were aspects of that survey that were not completely scientific," said Terry Weiner, a conservation coordinator with the Desert Protective Council. "All they did was count plants."



Ah jeez. Terry Weiner (whiner) is so completely lacking in intelligence.

Art Phillips did more than count plants one time. Check out what he's said. He's counted plants numberous times, plus done seed bank studies, ad infitum.

Terry Whiner hasn't done anything but walk down Gecko Road while being filmed for that pos PEER video.
SailAway
Actually, Terry Weiner is an intelligent, articulate and humerous person. She works hard for her "cause" and has expressed admiration for the passion of our community.

Unfortunately, she also seems to be easily taken in by the rhetoric spewed by so many in the anti-access community.

I haven't had a long conversation with her for quite some time but we used to correspond fairly often and she was never an anti-access zealot.

It would appear she's become quite a puppet for the bad guys. What a shame icon_sad.gif

Vicki
LoBuck
QUOTE (SailAway @ Mar 3 2004, 09:42 AM)
Actually, Terry Weiner is an intelligent, articulate and humerous person.  She works hard for her "cause" and has expressed admiration for the passion of our community.

Based on the what I recall to be 2 conversations and a few e-mails I had with Terry, I would agree with Vicki. I did get the feeling that she is one of the few "on that side of the fence (or stakes as the case may be)" that truly does care about the environment and not just anti-access.

Of course that has been over a year ago, so... who knows? unsure.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.