| QUOTE | ||
(Imperial Valley Press Online) http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2004...news/news02.txt By MARC SCHANZ, Staff Writer Tuesday, April 6, 2004 3:24 PM PDT Off-highway vehicle groups are petitioning Congress and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, furious that user fees from the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area are the sole funding source for a mandated plant survey of the Peirson's milk-vetch. "We're not opposed to monitoring. We realize that has to be done and we support good science," said Roy Denner, president of the Santee-based Off Road Business Association. Denner claims the four-month monitoring program, being conducted by BLM staff and contract workers in the dunes, is being paid for by the user fees of off-road enthusiasts who flock to the outdoor attraction during major holidays. Citing that the surveying is called for in the yet-to-be-implemented recreation area management plan, or RAMP, proposed by the BLM, Denner said he takes issue that OHV users are paying for the study on their own. "These are studies that are being mandated by the government," Denner said. "Why isn't the government paying for them, or at least helping?" BLM El Centro Field Office Manager Greg Thomsen said he has spoken with many representatives of the OHV community but concedes there's little he can do. "Unfortunately, we have to do these surveys. They are critical to implementing the (RAMP)," Thomsen said. "We have limited funding and some of our funding sources this year came up short." Thomsen points to the fact that California's OHV commission, which normally doles out grants to BLM's enforcement activities in the dunes, held back on grants for the Imperial Sand Dunes operations this year. "It's unfortunate but we had to do it this way," Thomsen said. OHV groups claim scientific surveys they sponsored are being ignored in the process. Denner points to the research of Arthur Phillips and his surveys of milk-vetch in the dunes, commissioned by a host of off-road vehicle groups, research that points to the milk-vetch's health and resiliency in the dunes environment. "They haven't taken any of this into the process of evaluating the (species)," Denner said. "Fish and Wildlife have decided that there is enough evidence to support looking at a delisting petition, so I don't see why Phillip's work is being ignored." Lynette Elser, resources chief at the BLM's El Centro office, said while Phillips' studies are excellent science, the BLM's survey is a much wider and comprehensive study. "We're not looking at longevity of the plant in certain areas. We're trying to find out just how many of these are out there in the dunes and where do they live," Elser said. In the background of the dispute over the management plan lies the pending decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over whether to proceed with delisting, or removing from a threatened species list, the milk-vetch, a decision closing in on its May deadline, according to spokeswoman Jane Hendron, with the service's Carlsbad office. Compelled by a lawsuit filed by the American Sand Association and other groups, the service must make a sped-up review of all the information regarding the milk-vetch before it can proceed with a delisting petition, Hendron said. If the delisting petition proceeds after May, it would alter the balance of the battle between OHV groups for open access to the dunes, and the environmental groups seeking to keep closed areas sealed from vehicles to protect plants and wildlife - putting the temporary closure areas in doubt again. >> Staff Writer Marc Schanz can be reached at 337-3452 or at mschanz@ivpressonline.com |
| QUOTE |
| BLM El Centro Field Office Manager Greg Thomsen said he has spoken with many representatives of the OHV community but concedes there's little he can do. "Unfortunately, we have to do these surveys. They are critical to implementing the (RAMP)," Thomsen said. "We have limited funding and some of our funding sources this year came up short." |
| QUOTE |
| January 29, 2004 The Honorable Gale Norton Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C. Street Northwest Washington, DC 20240 Dear Secretary Norton: The purpose of this correspondence is to address a pressing financial issue dealing with the land management of the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area (ISDRA) of the El Centro, California Field Office. Preceding our concerns, we would like you to know that the ISDRA Technical Review Team is pleased with its continued involvement in the management protocols at the ISDRA. We have a good working relationship with the El Centro BLM management and with its staff. We strive at productive exchanges of ideas and the implementing of our strategies. Under President Clinton=s administration, the Fee Demonstration program was implemented, thus enabling the formation of the TRT. Upon presentation, Congress and the public were told that the Fee Demonstration program was a funding avenue to augment appropriated dollars. In the past several years, since the implementation of the Fee Demonstration program, the TRT had been instrumental in making sound recommendations to the BLM on how to spend the money to improve the ISDRA. This fiscal year, the Fee Demo program has taken a turn and is now being used as an operational cost recovery program. This is due in part to the loss of Off Highway Motor Vehicle Recreational Grant money from the State of California. In addition to the Fee Demonstration funding being used as an operation and maintenance cost recovery, the biological opinion as contained in the Recreational Area Management Plan calls for continue plant and animal monitoring. In answer to this demand, the El Centro Field Office is planning on utilizing Fee Demonstration money to fund this ongoing project. We, the TRT, feel that the fees at the ISDRA are among the highest in the country and, the monitoring studies will drive the fee=s even higher. The biological opinion requiring species monitoring levied from one Federal agency to another has placed an unfair financial burden on the visiting public and due to its cost, jeopardizes basic services and resource protection. January 27, 2004 Page 2 Due to its current majority makeup, the California Off Highway Motor Vehicle Commission is opposed to the assignment of grants to the BLM for use at the Imperial Sand Dunes. We therefore request your assistance in obtaining annual appropriated funding to operate, manage and conduct the mandated biological monitoring at the ISDRA. In closing, the Fall 2003 joint BLM and US Forest service publication has listed the ISDRA as one of twelve outstanding locations in the United States where the public can enjoy various types of public land recreation. The ISDRA is a World Class Off Highway recreation area and deserves to be treated as such. If further assistance or information is needed, please feel free to contact either of us at the addresses or phone numbers listed below. ____________________________ Jerry Seaver, Chairman Phoenix, AZ 85051 ____________________________ Lawrence E. Jowdy, Vice Chairman Ontario, CA 91762 |
| QUOTE |
| OFF-ROAD BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, Inc. February 27, 2004 U.S. Congressman Richard Pombo U.S House of Representatives Rayburn Building #2411 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Pombo: This letter is about a matter that I consider to be of a very high degree of urgency! As I write, the Bureau of Land Management is kicking off an extensive monitoring effort in the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area (ISDRA) – to the tune of $1 million! The four-month project will employ 33 interns to scour the ISDRA looking for Pierson’s milk-vetch plants (PMV) and other imperiled wildlife to establish population counts. The entire allocated budget for the ISDRA is only $200,000. This project has been mandated by the Federal Government without any increase in appropriated dollars! Guess where the money will have to come from – USER FEES! User fees for the ISDRA have tripled this year and, with the delay to the implementation of the RAMP, recreationists there have seen NOTHING for their increased fees! Why should we sand dune enthusiasts have to pay AGAIN for a mandated survey of the milk-vetch plant? We already paid a well-known biological firm to do three different surveys on that plant and submitted the peer-reviewed reports to the BLM & USF&WS. Our surveys, which involved actual plant counts and seed-bank counts, are as scientific as it gets! USF&WS has already acknowledged that we have provided sufficient scientific information for them to proceed with the consideration of removing the plant from the threatened species list. Why is it that the Federal Government needs to spend a huge sum of money on studies that have already been done and recognized? Furthermore, if we succeed in getting the PMV delisted, this million dollars will have been wasted! In this time of budget crunches at state and federal levels, it is interesting that the government can justify spending a million dollars for a duplicate study in the dunes when there is insufficient funds to pump toilets, pick up trash, and provide adequate law enforcement. With the delay in getting a favorable biological opinion on the IDSRA RAMP, and the lack of adequate funding, we are facing the prospect of a significant increase in user fees next year to cover the cost of, not only operation and maintenance, but to pay for a duplicate monitoring study that may ultimately not be necessary. OHV leaders in California, Arizona, and Nevada will have their hands full stemming a big-time revolt! So, we need your help! Either much more money has to be appropriated specifically (and real soon) for the ISDRA, or federal mandates to perform duplicate studies need to be removed! Shouldn’t the environmental extremist groups, who used their funds to file lawsuits that got us into this mess, be paying for the environmental studies that they demand – instead of the OHV recreation community. Thank you for letting me express my concerns about this totally unfair, and perhaps illegal, situation. with best regards, Roy Denner, President & CEO Off-Road Business Association Cc: Congressman Duncan Hunter Congressman Randy Cunningham Congressman George Radanovich Congressman Darrell Issa Congressman John Doolittle Congressman Jerry Lewis Congressman Ken Calvert Congressman Gary Miller Congressman Devin Nunes Congressman Doug Ose Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Craig Manson Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Rebecca Watson National BLM Director, Kathleen Clarke CA State BLM Director, Mike Pool CA Desert District Manager, Linda Hansen El Centro BLM Manager, Greg Thomsen Off-Highway Vehicle organization leaders David Hubbard, OHV Attorney |
| QUOTE ( The Pastor @ Apr 8 2004, 01:58 PM) |
| Yeah, I think they were aware... but I think this is one of those issues that falls into the typical... "Well, that's the way the system works." |
| QUOTE (SailAway @ Apr 8 2004, 02:56 PM) |
| I would have to agree with The Pastor here... I'm sure this is just one more example of "That's just the way it is" which is precisely the answer the BLM likes to hear. Everyone sits down and the boat stops rocking. And we're left holding the bag. Vicki |
| QUOTE (Jerry Seaver) |
| This issue about the monitoring being paid for with the Fees at the ISDRA is one that was addressed at the TRT meeting last Oct., a letter was sent to Gale Norton the Sec. of Interior, expressing the TRT's displeasure with the Fees being used for something that is mandated by the Gov. Orba and ASA are going to Washington next week, and one of the issues that they will be talking about will be that monitoring should be paid for by something other than the User Fees. If an agency requires a study to be done, they should supply the money for it. |
| QUOTE (Winston Cup @ Apr 9 2004, 12:54 AM) |
| Woops, Glen ya beat me to it. Great job buddy, just trying to help you out a bit. |
| QUOTE (LoBuck @ Apr 8 2004, 11:39 PM) |
| As you can see from the letters above, the TRT is not among those saying "That's just the way it is" nor are we any of those who "sits down and the boat stops rocking". Be assured that the TRT is actively, and adamantly, opposed to Dune User Fees being used to fund these studies. |
| QUOTE (SailAway @ Apr 12 2004, 06:59 AM) |
| [QUOTE=LoBuck,Apr 8 2004, 11:39 PM] Are there notes of the last TRT meeting that would demonstrate the outrage the average dune users are feeling? Vicki |
| QUOTE (LoBuck @ Apr 12 2004, 08:17 AM) |
| The average duner is in no way cut-off from communicating with the BLM. By all means, the average duner should contact the BLM directly on any issue they feel they need/want to. The TRT is a resource for us, the dune user, but it should not be the only one. |