TomJeeps
Apr 17 2010, 07:32 AM
OHMVR Commission
APRIL 29, 2010 Commission Meeting Notice of Meeting
http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/pages/1140/files/N..._Apr29-2010.pdf Agenda
http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/pages/1140/files/A...2029%202010.pdf QUOTE
A. The Commission will receive a briefing from a representative of Senator Feinstein’s office on the proposed California Desert Protection Act of 2010, S 2921. As proposed, the bill provides for conservation, enhanced recreation opportunities, and development of renewable energy in the Southern California Desert Conservation Area.
Ladies and Gentlemen start you engines...TJ
jasonpwms129
Apr 17 2010, 01:35 PM
V.
A.
The Commission will receive a briefing from a representative of Senator Feinstein’s office on the proposed California Desert Protection Act of 2010, S 2921. As proposed, the bill provides for conservation, enhanced recreation opportunities, and development of renewable energy in the Southern California Desert Conservation Area.
B.
The BLM will present an overview of the draft Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area Management Plan (RAMP) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The RAMP/EIS outlines the future management of the 160,000-acre Dunes located in eastern Imperial County and analyzes the environmental impacts of the many land management issues. The BLM initiated a 90-day public comment period which will end June 24, 2010.
TomJeeps
May 2 2010, 05:56 PM
At the last Commission meeting James Peterson gave a presentation about the bill, District 37 and ORBA made their pitch for the bill and expressed anger they worked on this for two years and we're not happy with it, D36 under pressure from above caved a bit and gave "conditional support" for the bill guess that means not as written. He did hear my concerns about the Wild and Scenic rivers on the SBNF, one of the Commissioners also talked about the Sand to Snow National Monument on the North East side of SBNF, was concerned about the designation status off some of the routes running of SBNF to the Desert which I forgot about.
Helen Baker also pointed out supporting a Wilderness bill even if it don't effect OHV isolates us from other recreations, which goes against the Principles of CTUC she may have been speaking on behalf of Ed Waldheim who could not make it, great point can we exist in a vacuum I don't think so. Also James Peterson did at least hear my concerns but didn't stay for much of the public comments, so I would recommend all speakers at the meeting send your concerns to Senator Feinsteins office directly :ATTN James Peterson, don't depend on Division to do this for you...TJ