QUOTE (jtown777 @ Jan 13 2011, 06:17 AM)

QUOTE (tinytimslaw2 @ Jan 13 2011, 07:42 AM)

QUOTE (lokosvt @ Jan 12 2011, 08:02 PM)

I say we shoot the people in our government doing the background checks.
He may have been an honest, and perfectly acceptable employee when hired and the background was conducted, I don't believe that too many LEO start off as corrupt, but things change, addictions, finances, love, blackmail (and in the case of Latino descent, the very real threat of violence against family, across the border). I'm not excusing his behaviour, I do believe that he should be prosecuted, but I also believe he deserves a full and very thorough investigation, not just assumptions that four years ago, it was a lazy background.
Just for the record I've known several Border Patrol Officers and they were very proffesional Officers with a difficult and thankless job, many of which were LEO, with other agencies before joining the BP and with the exception of being fluent, in another language,
the requirements are not anymore stringent, than most other LEO agencies.
Tim
I respectfully beg to differ Tim.
Under the blanket of Homeland Security, which most local and state law enforcement are not, the requirements for background are significantly different. Having gone through this process over the past two years, and speaking daily with current agents, applicants and having close personal friends in the Border Patrol, P.D. and Sheriffs Dept. one thing we all agree on is the extensive background and training of USCPB. This is not an attempt to trump what you have said, just an update on current evaluations and investigations.
Everyone deserves a fair trial. However, preliminary reports on this case suggest that this was an extensive, ongoing investigation for who knows how long. A well calculated "raid" in conjunction with other Federal Agencies was performed and the Agent was caught with his pants down. He will have an opportunity to plead his case.
A very proud department indeed, and I stand by what I said earlier that it wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't turned in by his own peers. And for those of us waiting patiently for this career, it angers us to see someone abuse this privilege. I personally am for continued background updates annually . For all facets of law enforcement. However, budgets are strict and tight so I realize that that may never happen. We can only hope that the integrity of the individuals within the department will continue to govern and hold each other accountable.
Jtown777, first off, I wish you the best on the pursuit of your chosen career and I hope you get the "call" very soon, but bud, you gotta be careful
1st
Under the blanket of Homeland Security, which most local and state law enforcement are not, the requirements for background are significantly different. really? isn't TSA under that same blanket? and to be quiet honest, they should be capable of hiring a more professional group, I'm thinking you don't want to be too darned proud of the Dept. of Homeland Security association. (
GNOMEALLY, don't get bent...you know what I mean

)
2nd Under the blanket of Homeland Security,
which most local and state law enforcement are not, the requirements for background are significantly different.
You are correct, most local and state agencies are not under The Dept. of Homeland Security, most of these agencies also are not required to hire under affirmative action (if I'm not mistaken,Feds still use it) we do get to hire the most qualified with zero restrictions based on minority/ gender status.
3rd Under the blanket of Homeland Security, which most local and state law enforcement are not,
the requirements for background are significantly different.
It's probably like the old Marines vs. Soldiers "my boot camp was tougher than your boot camp" crap. As I've stated before I've known several BP Officers, adequate and professional officers, but I've known at least one that worked with me for 4-5 years and went to the BP, he was allowed to resign from our Dept. was ethically and morally challenged, not criminal, that I was aware of, but the point is BP performed a background investigation (nearly 1/2 year hiring process), had full disclosure from our Dept. and still hired him. It's been my expierence that most department perform an adequate background, some perform a very thorough and some just hire their brother-inlaws.
4th I'm not familar with USCPB or their training, Our departments training consists of 10-12 months, for the basic phase.
And yes there are departments that send their troops to the basic academy (16 weeks) and throw them in a car.
5th Just a word of caution, I performed backgroud investigations for several years, I still assist, one of the best sources of information is the internet, social networks, Youtube, google, your friends, your associates, yours co-workers (past and present), your family, your refrences, your hobbies....I use what you've placed on your application, I use what you've told the investigators, I read your blogs, their blogs, anything, anywhere, pics, videos.....it's amazing what information your friends, brothers, sisters, ex-wife, ex-girlfriends etc... will provide, I'm just saying it provides a lot of insight to someones real persona, maturity level, honesty, etc....
I wish you well my friend and really hope you get job. Tim