http://obsentinel.womacknewspapers.com/art...s/13plovers.txt

Judge sides with county

BY SANDY SEMANS, SENTINEL STAFF

A federal District Court judge has struck down a designation which deemed areas of the Cape Hatteras National Seashore as critical habitat for wintering piping plovers.

"We appreciate the court recognizing the importance of maintaining the public's ability to use and enjoy these beach areas on Hatteras Island," said Warren Judge, Chairman of the Dare County Board of Commissioners.

"Tourism is the lifeblood of Dare County's economy, and we are grateful that the Court took note of this. This ruling also reinforces the County's position on the short-bridge alternative to replace the Bonner Bridge, and our commitment to continue to fight for the public's right to access all of our beaches," he added.

The order, signed by U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, vacates designations for four North Carolina areas that had been deemed critical habitat for wintering piping plovers.

Dare and Hyde counties and the Cape Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance filed the suit against the U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Secretary of Interior Gale Norton and Steven Williams.

Designation of critical habitat along North Carolina's coast came as a result of a 1996 suit filed by the Defenders of Wildlife in an attempt to get the federal government to place critical habitat designation for the Great Lakes and North Great Plains populations of piping plovers. In 2000, a court ordered the Fish and Wildlife Service to carry out those designations. Because all piping plovers winter along the Atlantic Coast south of North Carolina along the Gulf Coast and in the Caribbean, the two piping plover populations addressed in the lawsuit could not be isolated from other populations when on their wintering grounds. Therefore, the Service designated critical habitat for all U.S. wintering piping plovers
collectively.

When implemented in this state, the designated areas totaled about 6800 acres and 126 of linear miles of shoreline.

Lamberth noted in his 43-page written opinion that the Service didn't follow a laundry list of criteria needed before such designation could occur.

The opinion states that the Service must determine that "those physical or biological features essential to the conservation of the species and which may require special management considerations or protection" - PCEs - are "found" on specific areas with the area to be designated.

"It appears that, incredibly, the Service admits in the final rule [posting the designation in the Federal Register] that some designated areas do not contain PCEs," wrote Lambreth.

"The Service's argued-for interpretation, essentially that designation is proper merely if PCEs will likely be found in the future, is simply beyond the pale of the statute," states the opinion.

A list of other shortcomings in the determination of critical habitat designations also were noted in the opinion, including the interpretation of "best available science," economic impact, and compliance with other federal laws and regulations including the National Environmental Policy Act.

Is it me or is the tide sloooooowly shifting against the eco-nazis

it's nice to have something like this to hold onto while we fight our own fight out here. I think that the time has come that the BS the eco-nazis have pulled is finally being uncovered nationwide... and it's about time. Now I'd like like to see some countersuits filed against them.