Now don't take this as any sort of criticism. This is my experience of discussions with chassis designers in other forms of motorsports. Like road racing, formula types and Trophy trucks.
Their method is to first choose the components like engine, trans, suspension components and passenger compartment requirements.
After creating a "list" of the components with their functioning requirements( space needed, angles, stresses, materials, weights, etc), the basic layout and component positioning is finalized with regard to rules requirements of width, length, wheelbase, height, weight, etc.
Then and only then do they lay out the chassis. The chassis is only a "lace work" of material to connect the components in a way to maximize the physical requirements of torsional rigidity, beam strength and natural frequency desired to house the chosen components. Tubes go every direction to maximize the goal for that component.
Ever wonder why most racing chassis use a wide mix of rectangular, square, round tubing? And why they utilize a mix of mitred, bent and straight sections?
The many racing chassis that I've seen without their skin, to most, are not very pretty. Some might even call them confused and ugly.
But when keeping in mind the exact functionality of their goals, they're goddam works of art.
In one particular case, I remember a cluster of 9 tubes meeting in a singular 9 point star that looked like an 8 into 1 header just above the drivers right shoulder. As a fabber, that must have taken untold hours to get it all right and then TIG welded.
Buggy builders do a great job of creating asthetically pleasing works of art.
Just my comments...
Carl