GlamisDunes.com > ASA PMV study not peer-reviewed

Full Version: ASA PMV study not peer-reviewed

GlamisDunes.com > Sand Community Issues > Your Environmental Opinion

Bluesky

Nov 6 2002, 06:36 AM

IMPERIAL VALLEY PRESS - Nov. 4, 2002
http://www.ivpressonline.com

"Our studies show the Peirson's milkvetch is thriving," ASA environmental
liaison Grant George said. [Roll Eyes]

Peirson's milkvetch is a short-lived perennial legume with purple flowers.

Conservation groups have criticized the ASA-sponsored report, saying it has
not been peer reviewed.

"Reports are generally not peer-reviewed. Publications in a scientific
journal are peer reviewed. We did not violate any scientific protocol by
not submitting our report for peer review," the report's author, Arthur
Phillips said.

[ 11-11-2002, 09:32 PM: Message edited by: Bluesky ]

Permagrin

Nov 6 2002, 07:30 AM

dezfan1

Nov 6 2002, 02:10 PM

And your point is? [Confused]

LIVE FREE OR DIE!

SailAway

Nov 6 2002, 02:59 PM

quote:
Originally posted by dezfan1:
And your point is?

LIVE FREE OR DIE!

hidden if he combs his hair just right

Permagrin

Nov 6 2002, 04:13 PM

LOL!

Bluesky

Nov 6 2002, 06:10 PM

I've heard Jason for one insist that the ASA study was peer-reviewed and insist that all other studies fulfill that requirement. Now we read that the ASA study was NOT per-reviewed. What gives? Did the Phillips screw the ASA?

dezfan1

Nov 6 2002, 06:18 PM

quote:
the ASA study was NOT per-reviewed.

How do you PER -review something? [Confused]

Sucks when someone picks out every little error in grammar doesn't it! [Wink]

And it was a report, not a study! [Roll Eyes]

LIVE FREE OR DIE!

jhitesma

Nov 6 2002, 07:54 PM

For those just joining us the researcher who prepared the report made some posting a few months back explanining this in some detail. He also wrote a letter to the IV Press debunking the CBD's attempts to discredit him.

BS has read the researchers replies to these claims and even responded to them in the past so I won't go down that road again here. The person most qualified to answer these questions already has but apparantly that's not enough for some people.

Bluesky

Nov 7 2002, 04:49 AM

quote:
For those just joining us the researcher who prepared the report made some posting a few months back explanining this in some detail.

why not post those links? I for one was under the impression that the study WAS peer-reviewed based on YOUR assertions, Jason.

DUNERAIDER

Nov 7 2002, 04:45 PM

Bluesky;

My offer is still open for us to film you spending your donors money on drugs and rent,in our forthcoming video "WHY WE FIGHT".

99% of the US riding areas are now closed. For profit enviro groups like the CBD, have made good livings creating a cottage industry for themselves in an effort to crush the small portion of riding areas left.

CBD Members are those who lothe private ownership of property, private business, one person-one vote.

Since man first stepped foot on earth, someone has been trying to tell everyone what to do, and the CBD has found a new way in the form of Trojan Horse laws and a judge.

Ross

[ 11-07-2002, 04:48 PM: Message edited by: DUNERAIDER ]

JET

Nov 7 2002, 05:32 PM

Also be careful what you criticise. Not all the studies put out by the "Gang Green" are peer reviewed. Not one of the pieces of informatin I have seen the piece of mule dung posts lists how and where it was peer reviewed.

I will say it again, stop smoking crack before you post.

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.