Sent this one today also.
Hiking in the Imperial Sand Dunes
Comments: In a recent letter posted by Daniel Patterson concerning the Imperial Sand Dunes. I had the privilage of reading his so called facts, and found most of them very misleading. Non so much as the one he stated that a 50/50 management would contribute 3.3 million dollars to local economies from non-motorized visitors. These numbers are primarily based on California hiking as a whole, and oviously some hiking spots are a lot more popular than others. I would like to see the numbers of hikers the Sand Dunes draw each year. I'm sure its not anywhere near that of Big Sur, or Yosemite. Daniel also speaks of Crowd issues in the dunes. From his numbers I see that 58 percent of Californias enjoy hiking. Imagine that 58 percent on top of the already thousands of OHV people out there. What kinda enviroment impact would that have out there. Remember it would need these numbers to ensure that Imperial county economies got that 3.3 million bonus that Daniel Patterson speaks of. Just something to think about when you read Facts that Daniel Patterson voices.
Eric Valkema