Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: I S D R A T R T Meeting Friday, July 28, 2006
GlamisDunes.com > Sand Community Issues > Technical Review Team - Your Glamis Fees
LoBuck
The next TRT meeting will be held at the BLM El Centro Field Office on Friday, July 28, 2006.

The BLM ECFO is located at 1661 South 4th Street in El Centro, CA. This meeting is open to the public.

If you have specific questions or concerns that you would like to be brought up at the meeting PLEASE POST THEM HERE or email them to trtemail@aol.com , or to any of the TRT representatives.

Another option is to use the Feedback Form on the ISDRA TRT website.

ISDRA TRT AGENDA
July 28, 2006
El Centro BLM Office
1661 S. 4th St.
760-337-4400

Additions to Agenda 9:00 A.M.
Introductions,
New TRT Members

Approval of Minutes - TRT

Chairman’s Report - Seaver

Dac Report - Zale/Denner

UDG Report Gilles
Newspaper -
Cleanup report
Kiosks
Haas Survey
Rule Sign Project - Szalwinski

Items of Concern reported to the TRT - Montgomery

Old Business
Personnel - Wood
L.E. Chief
L.E. Supervisor
Resourse Chief
Recreation Chief
Seasonal Park Rangers
Assistant Dune Manager

Bermed Tracks - Asciutto

Fee Program update - ICSO
Next Season’s Plans
Where to Buy Passes

Assistance Agreement Update - ICSO/Hamada
ISDRA Budget - BLM
Fee Budget and Collections to date - Hamada
Ramp Projects – Progress on implementation - Hamada
Dumpster Status and Compliance - Hamada
Schedule of Projects - Hamada
South Dunes Ranger Station - Hamada
Map Reprint - Hamada
Trash Train - Hamada
Vendor Report - Hamada

Law Suit update - Wood
Update on Pipeline and Canal Projects - Zale

Public Comment 12:00 P.M.

Lunch

New Business
Monitoring Status - Dreyfess
LE Report - Beene
Numbers for the Season
Towed Vehicles
Comp Hill
New L.E. Buggies
Direction for Next Season

Public Comment –

Adjourn
HozaykwAIRvo
Hey Glenn, what time does this party kick off? 25deal.gif
BeachHead
QUOTE(LoBuck @ Jul 2 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]1724636[/snapback]


Additions to Agenda 9:00 A.M.





I'm guessing there was a formatting issue, and it's 9:00 am.

I checked out the trt website, and it confirms this:

The next TRT meeting will be held at the BLM El Centro Field Office on Friday, July 28, 2006 at 9:00am PST.
HozaykwAIRvo
Doh.. Thanks BH. It's monday here and I'm not quite with it after a warm weekend at G icon_hot.gif
LoBuck
Well, I see you guys got it all figured out. 9:00am it is.

Sorry for the confusion. kg.gif
LoBuck
Heres a reminder for the TRT meeting.

The best way to get something to the TRT for the Items of Concern topic is to use the Feedback Form on the ISDRA TRT website.

Times running out. I got to get these in by Wednesday.

Thanks!
Robbie
any notes from the meeting?
HozaykwAIRvo
I'm sure there will be pirate.gif

Great meeting, good info thumb.gif

Big thanks to everyone involved with oragnizing it and participating in it.
LoBuck
QUOTE(Robbie @ Jul 28 2006, 05:10 PM) [snapback]1771135[/snapback]

any notes from the meeting?

The meeting was still going when you posted that Robbie. smile.gif Looong meeting today.

The meeting was recorded again. It will take a few days to get the tracks formatted by agenda item (like last time) and uploaded to www.isdratrt.org. There will also be some presentations and the FY06 Budget Tracking uploaded.

Great meeting with a lot of info and discussion. It will be worthwhile to listen to the audio recordings.

We did have a good turn out of dune users. Thanks to gd.comers BeachHead, azdesertrat, JChappy, & Hozay for coming out. howdy.gif
Sanduners
Thanks Glenn for making the recordings. I wanted to attend but had a manditory training "BS" class today at work... Looking forward to hearing it on Memorex... icon_wink.gif
BeachHead
Wow....what a long, but very very interesting day. This was my first TRT meeting, and what an eye opener it was. First, I have to thank everyone who was there, the TRT team, the BLM team, the Sheriff-elect, the ICSO officers, the guest speakers, and the rest of the audience. Since it was my first meeting, I had a lot of new people to meet, and I sincerely apologize to those who were there that I did not get to personally meet, as I know how big of an effort it really was to be there.

For those of you who missed it, it will be well worth your time to listen to the recordings when Glenn gets them posted. There was a lot of very good information and discussion. The speakers were well prepared, and I felt quite honest and frank in their answers, even though they knew we wouldn't like some of them. It will not be surprising that the information will be "good" to some, "bad" to others, but it was good to hear it from the horses mouth rather than second or third hand.

I strongly urge those who have even the slightest interest in how our dunes are being run, and what's happening, or going to happen, to make the effort to attend these meetings. Unlike other meetings I've been too as part of the "audience", we were all allowed to question and comment on the issues during discussion. I don't recall anyone not being able to ask any question they wanted, and while not every answer was what any of us wanted to hear, I didn't see any real beating around the bush, and everyone and their opinion was treated in a very respectful manner.

We have some unfavorable and unacceptable conditions at the dunes, but it was certainly refreshing to see that there has been some actions by those who manage the dunes to try and address some of the issues that confront us every time we go to Mother G.
LoBuck
Larry Jowdy posted a few quick notes in the TRT forum on the ASA BBS so I'm going to "tag team" and post it here.

QUOTE("Larry Jowdy")
Although I don't have a great deal of time this morning, I'm going to touch on some highlights of the 7/28/06 TRT meeting. Glenn Montgomery "Lobuck" is working on the audio recording and will have it posted in a few days on the ISDRATRT site http://isdratrt.org/index.php

I'll start with "Jeeps" The Imperial Co. sheriff's are working with the BLM on having an exemption form available for those that tow Jeeps to the dunes. It will be in place prior to the beginning of this season. They did mention that a Jeeper with an exemption form may get stopped but once he/she shows the form, they will be free to leave.

Additionally, the ICSO will have greater coverage to sell passes at the dunes via automated machines and people on the ground with remote credit card machines. Passes will be available on Aug. 14th however they are taking orders via their website and phone.
http://imperialsanddunes.org/isdraMain.html

The ICSO is looking for additional vendors willing to sell passes, all that's required is they have a valid business license, fill out some forms and accept the terms of the agreement. The long term goal is to have 80% of the passes sold via the internet/vendors/telephone rather than on site.

The ISCO will have a new Sheriff beginning in January, Sheriff Ray Loera elect, was present at the meeting and has indicated that his new department will continue their working relationship with the BLM and Sheriff elect Loera also stated that he will be more personally involved in the day to day activities as they relate to the dunes. Additionally, the new Lieutenant in charge of their off highway vehicle team is very receptive to new idea's as opposed to the former Lt. and seems willing to make concessions, provide more training to his staff and work toward the greater good.

A report was given on the new canal being installed along I-8 and the new pipeline that will be both north and south of the canal. The contractors are aware and are working on keeping the dunes totally accessible during construction.

Monitoring of the Piersons Milk Vetch went as expected, low numbers due to no rain and minimal damage due to OHV activity. Many plants were destroyed but it's due to animals eating the plant.

Unfortunately, I don't have time to go on but more information will be provided by Glenn or myself in the next few days.

In closing, I might add that this was a very productive meeting with a great deal of good information.

Larry Jowdy
TRT Vice Chairman


QUOTE("Larry Jowdy")
In closing, I might add that this was a very productive meeting with a great deal of good information.

I wholeheartedly agree. One of the best we've had.
LoBuck
A couple of other things worth a quick mention:

There will be some new Pads and some others extended on Gecko Road.

There is a strong possibility that pit toilets will soon be going in down South at Dune Buggy Flats and in the North Washes #4, #6, and #10. This would replace the use of the portable toilets placed in these locations on the major holidays. BLM is in the process of getting the Envirnomental Impact Study completed & approved.
jhitesma
QUOTE(LoBuck @ Jul 29 2006, 10:04 PM) [snapback]1772873[/snapback]

There is a strong possibility that pit toilets will soon be going in down South at Dune Buggy Flats and in the North Washes #4, #6, and #10. This would replace the use of the portable toilets placed in these locations on the major holidays. BLM is in the process of getting the Envirnomental Impact Study completed & approved.


I'm hoping that before the BLM goes breaking out their checkbook the TRT reminded them of the results of the last user survey where more people wanted the pit toilets gone than wanted new ones:

QUOTE

There are some Dune Users (19%) that feel that the portable toilets should be replaced by permanent Pit Toilets and are nearly even split for putting them at Wash Road (36%) and Dune Buggy Flats (35%). However, other Dune Users (23%) feel the portable toilets should be eliminated.


For an agency who keeps saying they don't have enough money the BLM sure seems to keep looking for new ways to spend it. As so many others have asked before....

Why not give the users what they're asking for and cut spending and lower fees instead of building more and more infrastructure that only a small percentage (Less than 20%!) of the visitors want?

LoBuck
Jason, You left out the first part of that summary that showed 50% felt the portable toilets should be left at the current quantities. Here is the complete summary of that section of the survey:

They feel that the current level of Trash Dumpsters are fine (64%), and that the Portable Toilets should be left at current quantities (50%). There are some Dune Users (19%) that feel that the portable toilets should be replaced by permanent Pit Toilets and are nearly even split for putting them at Wash Road (36%) and Dune Buggy Flats (35%). However, other Dune Users (23%) feel the portable toilets should be eliminated.

IPB Image


Don't think I don't hear or don't agree with what you're saying about lowering the fees because I do. But we all know that isn't going to happen no matter if the TRT or anyone else recommends it. All the TRT can do is to recommend the best use for the fees that are going to be spend.

The TRT has to look at it this way. If fees can be spent on something that even only 19% of dune users want, while shifting O&M money (approx $78,000 for portables that 50% of dune users feel OK to keep paying) to pay for something that can be available for dune users for 365 days a year instead of 20 - 25 days, it makes sense to do so.

The TRT did not disagree with the BLM in this decision.
Crowdog
Thanks to all that are on the TRT and to those that attended this meeting. 1dude.gif
jhitesma
So Glenn, does this mean that the BLM's budget crunch is over? From what you're saying it sounds like they have money to burn just sitting there and are now looking for ways to spend it.

For years the only thing we've heard from the BLM is that they don't have enough money to do the bare minimum and are ending up in the red each year.

What changed that now suddenly the have surplus money sitting around and are looking for was to spend it?

And is this money left over from last year or are they counting their eggs before they hatch and looking for ways to spend this years money even though they don't really know how much they'll have yet?
GRANT@FUNCO
QUOTE(jhitesma @ Jul 30 2006, 12:46 PM) [snapback]1773254[/snapback]

So Glenn, does this mean that the BLM's budget crunch is over? From what you're saying it sounds like they have money to burn just sitting there and are now looking for ways to spend it.

For years the only thing we've heard from the BLM is that they don't have enough money to do the bare minimum and are ending up in the red each year.

What changed that now suddenly the have surplus money sitting around and are looking for was to spend it?

And is this money left over from last year or are they counting their eggs before they hatch and looking for ways to spend this years money even though they don't really know how much they'll have yet?


Jason , my understanding is the money came from the State BLM . Moneys that were not spent on PMV monitoring . Not fee dollars .

LoBuck
QUOTE(GRANT@FUNCO @ Jul 30 2006, 01:17 PM) [snapback]1773315[/snapback]

QUOTE(jhitesma @ Jul 30 2006, 12:46 PM) [snapback]1773254[/snapback]

So Glenn, does this mean that the BLM's budget crunch is over? From what you're saying it sounds like they have money to burn just sitting there and are now looking for ways to spend it.

For years the only thing we've heard from the BLM is that they don't have enough money to do the bare minimum and are ending up in the red each year.

What changed that now suddenly the have surplus money sitting around and are looking for was to spend it?

And is this money left over from last year or are they counting their eggs before they hatch and looking for ways to spend this years money even though they don't really know how much they'll have yet?


Jason , my understanding is the money came from the State BLM . Moneys that were not spent on PMV monitoring . Not fee dollars .

My observations: The BLM El Centro Field Office for the last 2 years has tracked the budget better than ever before with a detailed spreadsheet. By doing this they know what revenues they have coming in and the expenditures they must have and when they will be spent. They have looked over contracts and obligated spending and made improvements. They have been more sucessfull (often with the assistance of orgs such as the ASA, UDG, & ORBA) at getting more federal appropriations and other grants. This no doubt has improved the bottom line.

With a few months remaining, it is not clear right now where the BLM will end budget wise at the end of FY06. However, some of the obilgated spending for FY07 is being prepared for. This insures that there will be no loss of services at the begining of the season.
LoBuck
QUOTE(LoBuck @ Jul 29 2006, 10:04 PM) [snapback]1772873[/snapback]

There will be some new Pads and some others extended on Gecko Road.

A bit more info and some maps are now available at isdratrt.org.

See the article:
Camping Pads to be Added, Extended on Gecko Road
azdesertrat
thanks glenn that is some good info
jhitesma
QUOTE(GRANT@FUNCO @ Jul 30 2006, 01:17 PM) [snapback]1773315[/snapback]

QUOTE(jhitesma @ Jul 30 2006, 12:46 PM) [snapback]1773254[/snapback]

So Glenn, does this mean that the BLM's budget crunch is over? From what you're saying it sounds like they have money to burn just sitting there and are now looking for ways to spend it.

For years the only thing we've heard from the BLM is that they don't have enough money to do the bare minimum and are ending up in the red each year.

What changed that now suddenly the have surplus money sitting around and are looking for was to spend it?

And is this money left over from last year or are they counting their eggs before they hatch and looking for ways to spend this years money even though they don't really know how much they'll have yet?


Jason , my understanding is the money came from the State BLM . Moneys that were not spent on PMV monitoring . Not fee dollars .



Grant, either Bob got things wrong in his notes from the ASA meeting...or you were misled or misheard someone:

QUOTE

Plan is to install 14 2 stall toilets in Washroad, Glamis, Gecko road, Dunebuggy flats, and vendors. The contract with current portable toilet company costs 61K year for 6 major weekends. The permanent toilets cost $20K ea. The maintenance of the pemanent toilets will be the same as the portable ones, thus those visiting the ISDRA will have use of toilet facilities year round rather than just the 6 big holiday weekends. The upfront cost is being paid for by fee money.


I'm still wondering what the justificaton is for spending more money on more toilets when the survey shows more people would rather see the toilets gone completely than upgraded...espically when it comes out of our fee money.

It may be cheaper in the long run than keeping the portables - but the survey respondents still seem to have prefered doing away with any toilets to spending more on keeping or upgrading.

The BLM's actions make sense if they're required to have toilets..but they're not. I have to wonder if they're using fee money to build infrastructure that will make it possible for them to start charging an entry fee under the FLREA. It seems that they're basically charging us to build the infrastructure they need to be able to legally charge us more.

SailAway
QUOTE(jhitesma @ Aug 30 2006, 11:35 AM) [snapback]1837378[/snapback]

The BLM's actions make sense if they're required to have toilets..but they're not. I have to wonder if they're using fee money to build infrastructure that will make it possible for them to start charging an entry fee under the FLREA. It seems that they're basically charging us to build the infrastructure they need to be able to legally charge us more.

There are a lot of people wondering about this. Why have a survey and then act against it?

Unless acting against it builds the path to legally doing what has been done illegally all along.

Vicki
LoBuck
QUOTE(jhitesma @ Aug 30 2006, 11:35 AM) [snapback]1837378[/snapback]
I'm still wondering what the justificaton is for spending more money on more toilets when the survey shows more people would rather see the toilets gone completely than upgraded...espically when it comes out of our fee money.

It may be cheaper in the long run than keeping the portables - but the survey respondents still seem to have prefered doing away with any toilets to spending more on keeping or upgrading.


QUOTE(SailAway)
There are a lot of people wondering about this. Why have a survey and then act against it?


The survey showed that 50% of the people surveyed wanted portable toilets left at the current levels. Just 23% wanted them eliminated. What this part of the survey told me was that the majority of people surveyed want toilets at the ISDRA.

Here's a quote from a post I made a few above this one (#15).

QUOTE(LoBuck)
Jason, You left out the first part of that summary that showed 50% felt the portable toilets should be left at the current quantities. Here is the complete summary of that section of the survey:

They feel that the current level of Trash Dumpsters are fine (64%), and that the Portable Toilets should be left at current quantities (50%). There are some Dune Users (19%) that feel that the portable toilets should be replaced by permanent Pit Toilets and are nearly even split for putting them at Wash Road (36%) and Dune Buggy Flats (35%). However, other Dune Users (23%) feel the portable toilets should be eliminated.

IPB Image


Don't think I don't hear or don't agree with what you're saying about lowering the fees because I do. But we all know that isn't going to happen no matter if the TRT or anyone else recommends it. All the TRT can do is to recommend the best use for the fees that are going to be spend.

The TRT has to look at it this way. If fees can be spent on something that even only 19% of dune users want, while shifting O&M money (approx $78,000 for portables that 50% of dune users feel OK to keep paying) to pay for something that can be available for dune users for 365 days a year instead of 20 - 25 days, it makes sense to do so.

The TRT did not disagree with the BLM in this decision.

Because of the cost offset, I believe the BLM, and the TRT, acted within the wishes of the majority (50%) of respondents to that section of the survey.
jhitesma
I still don't get how this is a "cost offset" The notes from the ASA meeting say that the BLM said it will cost the same to maintain the new pit toilets as it did to have the portables on site.

While at the same time the 14 new toilets are going to cost $20k each That's almost $300k additional on top of the $60k-$70k per year maintance being spent out of fee money when the BLM is still saying they don't have money to spend on necessities like radios, signage and staff.

There is no cost savings here. They may be getting more for the existing $60-$70k they spend already. But they're spending another $300k to do it.

I'm still curious where exactly this $300k is coming from. Grant said it's from other budget sources and not fee money. But apparently at the ASA meeting the BLM said it IS coming from fee money.

If it's fee money is this $300k surpluss that they had leftover from last year...or are they spending money they don't have yet from this years sales?

Add in the money being spent on new pads and it sure sounds like the "budget crunch" is over and the BLM has plenty to start providing users what they want...but it still looks like they're not going to listen to the users and instead focus on things that will benefit the BLM instead.
jhitesma
One other thing. In the past we've heard repeatedly from the BLM that they may have to stop providing the portable toilets because of budget issues.

But now they're spending $300k additional to build permanant toilets that will require the same cost and upkeep.

With the portables the option existed to simply not have them and save money. With permanant toilets they now HAVE to spend that $60-$70k per year on upkeep and maintance.

If they complained the past few years about spending the $60-$70k then why are they suddenly able to spend $300k to assure they'll have to keep spending that $60-$70k from now on?

The numbers just don't add up with what the BLM has said repeatedly in the past.
SailAway
Those aren’t the only numbers that don’t add up. Holy moly, this has got to be the most ingenuous manipulation of mathematical percentages since I don’t know when.

It’s clear that the bottom line is as it always has been... The El Centro BLM is going to do what they want and simply invent justifications for their actions as they go.

And lucky them, they have plenty of help and support to just keep on doing it, no end in sight.

Vicki

[edited to clarify El Centro BLM]
The Pastor
QUOTE
The BLM's actions make sense if they're required to have toilets..but they're not. I have to wonder if they're using fee money to build infrastructure that will make it possible for them to start charging an entry fee under the FLREA. It seems that they're basically charging us to build the infrastructure they need to be able to legally charge us more.

This concerns me terribly...

To add my 2cents...

At what point did Glamis become a democracy?
What difference does it matter who wants what?

I could put together a poll that said a majority of people want a paved campground with room for 2000 units. Does that make it good for Glamis?

The BLM are supposed to be tasked with protecting the natural beauty of Glamis. They are most definantly NOT tasked with creating a cushy camping experience for as many people as possible.

I talked a bit with some people about these toilets and it seemed clear to me that the understanding is that the people of Glamis need toilets.
I questioned that assumption and was basically laughed down.
My comment: "Why do I have to pay to take care of someone elses crap?"

We don't need the pit toilets. We don't need the portables. We NEED education and fair enforcement of existing laws.

Bring your own damn toilet.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.