Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: New Desert Lawsuit
GlamisDunes.com > Sand Community Issues > Glamis Issues
ZukiFreak
PRESS RELEASE FROM CA4WDC

FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:
Don Klusman 530-671-4587

Environmentalists Try Again to Close CDCA

A new lawsuit was filed on May 28, 2003, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division (case #C-03-2509) against the Bureau of Land Management and US Fish & Wildlife Service. Plaintiff's allege that the Biological Opinions of April 3, 2003, and June 17, 2003, are arbitrary, capricious, and inconsistent with the law.

This lawsuit arises from a lawsuit filed in the Spring of 2000 by the same plaintiffs. CA4WDC and the Blue Ribbon Coalition were granted Intervener status in that case. We were able to negotiate a stipulated consent decree settlement among the parties to that suit which in part specified that the BLM was to consult with the FWS and, in the interim, provided for interim relief limited OHV use in specified areas of the California Desert Conservation Area, including habitat for the desert tortoise and Peirson's milk vetch. As a result of that decree, huge areas of the 25,000,000 acre CDCA were temporarily placed off limits to OHV activity (almost 50,000 acres of Glamis, Surprise Canyon, etc.) pending the issuance of a Biological Opinion by the FWS pertaining to among other things, the effects of OHV activity on these endangered species.

This last April's Biological Opinion issued by the FWS regarding the BLM's Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area Management Plan concluded that said plan, scheduled to be implemented by August 15, 2003, was not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the desert tortoise or the Peirson's milk vetch. Consequently, almost all of the public lands temporarily closed at Glamis were going to be reopened for use by all of the public.

The June Biological Opinion considered the recently amended desert tortoise Recovery Plan and concluded that the current CDCA plan will not jeopardize the desert tortoise or adversely modify its critical habitat. While much of the current CDCA plan would have allowed the reopened much of the public lands that had been closed under the original consent decree, some public lands would have been permanently closed to OHV activity so as to protect the desert tortoise.

CA4WDC and the Blue Ribbon Coalition plan to once again file to get Intervener status in this lawsuit. Achieving Intervener status is the only way to be recognized as a party to the suit. We do not intend to be a mere witness to a lawsuit which will impact our activity.

--
John Stewart
Director, Environmental Affairs,
United Four Wheel Drive Associations, http://www.ufwda.org
Recreation Access and Conservation Editor, http://www.4x4wire.com
Moderator, MUIRNet - Multiple Use Information Resource Network

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to MUIRNet, send email to john@muirnet.net.

A fundamental law of public land access is:

Increased habitat designation for threatened and endangered species
is directly proportional to loss of access to public lands.
SailAway
This is the lawsuit I mentioned in another post... and we'll be talking more about it tomorrow night :rant:

It was a preemptive strike by the anti-access crowds, designed to beat the system by throwing up a roadblock before the record of decision on the RAMP is even in place.

From what I understand another intervenor on the original action, the San Diego Off Road Coalition, will also be petitioning for intervenor status on this action.

This is nothing less than expected... they are desparate and it shows.

Vicki
ZukiFreak
I just hope all the intervenors get together this time and don't fight amongst themselves... know what i mean
SailAway
QUOTE
I just hope all the intervenors get together this time and don't fight amongst themselves... know what i mean


Yeah, I do know what you mean. One thing for sure is this time we're all much smarter. Hopefully our increased knowledge will show in our negotiations.

The members of the intervening organizations MUST make their wishes clear. If we want or expect a certain outcome, it's up to us to make sure the leaders of the intervening organizations are aware of our wants and expectations.

Vicki
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.